Yay for the Big C!
No I don't mean Cancer!
The House of Reps voted the other day to return administration of the drug RU486 to the TGA, removing one tiny reign of power from the grasp of a politician. Now, I am not about to dive into a rant about Tony Abbot, I would never vote for him, but his beliefs- whatever sustains him within reason- are his own affair. I will say (to confuse the correspondent who called me a Communist) that I don't think Kerry Nettle did the right thing with her t-shirt. (Keep your rosary's off my ovary's) One of the problems faced by the left is the perception that we are all a bunch of student radicals who have not grown up yet. Nettles T-shirt doesn't really help that perception. Anyway not really what I wanted to talk about.
Lyn Allison, Leader of the Australian Democrats, was the originator of the private members bill, legislation drafted in line with Democrat social policy. Allowed a conscience vote it ripped through both houses, attempts at stonewalling, ammendation and dare we say it squashing the bill outright, failed. It passed with a huge majority in both houses.
The thing I find most gratifying, is not the social justice victory for women, gratifying though it is, but rather what the process represents.
Increasingly parliament has been dominated by the whole "party discipline"cheap insult wedge and division style of politics so beloved of our esteemed Prime Miniature. I must admit I couldn't believe he would relinquish even the small amount of power he did to allow the conscience vote, yes I know he did the stern uncle thing in the lower house, basically trying to brow beat the Libs into voting no.
The thing that truly impresses me is the manner in which the bill entered the house in the first place. Allison drafts a private members bill, then forms a cross party coalition with members of labor, libs and nationals.
Is this the merest glimmer, the simplest suggestion that maybe things are changing, that the macho posturing, huffing, puffing and blowing from the likes of Howard and Beazley could be on the way to becoming a thing of the past?
Truthfully, the answer is in all likelyhood no.
That would be sensible, honest and altruistic, something that modern politics could never be accused of being. On the otherhand we can only hope.
Having said all of that, the list of who voted where that is available on the Bartlett Diaries
www.andrewbartlett.com/blog/?p=138 site makes for interesting reading. Particularly when one looks at the patterns of the Liberal Party. Surprises included Vanstone voting for the bill, but also the way the votes align.
On one side we have Abbot, Howard and Downer. On the other the likes of Andrew Southcott, Malcolm Turnbull QC and Peter Costello. Is this more evidence of the nasty factional split that we all know lies at the heart of the Libs? Could this be Costello, sickening of being shafted by Howard (think over the last few months) positioning himself for another run at the top job. Could this even be evidence of a new moderate or liberal consrvatism.
I can't wait to see what happens next!
The House of Reps voted the other day to return administration of the drug RU486 to the TGA, removing one tiny reign of power from the grasp of a politician. Now, I am not about to dive into a rant about Tony Abbot, I would never vote for him, but his beliefs- whatever sustains him within reason- are his own affair. I will say (to confuse the correspondent who called me a Communist) that I don't think Kerry Nettle did the right thing with her t-shirt. (Keep your rosary's off my ovary's) One of the problems faced by the left is the perception that we are all a bunch of student radicals who have not grown up yet. Nettles T-shirt doesn't really help that perception. Anyway not really what I wanted to talk about.
Lyn Allison, Leader of the Australian Democrats, was the originator of the private members bill, legislation drafted in line with Democrat social policy. Allowed a conscience vote it ripped through both houses, attempts at stonewalling, ammendation and dare we say it squashing the bill outright, failed. It passed with a huge majority in both houses.
The thing I find most gratifying, is not the social justice victory for women, gratifying though it is, but rather what the process represents.
Increasingly parliament has been dominated by the whole "party discipline"cheap insult wedge and division style of politics so beloved of our esteemed Prime Miniature. I must admit I couldn't believe he would relinquish even the small amount of power he did to allow the conscience vote, yes I know he did the stern uncle thing in the lower house, basically trying to brow beat the Libs into voting no.
The thing that truly impresses me is the manner in which the bill entered the house in the first place. Allison drafts a private members bill, then forms a cross party coalition with members of labor, libs and nationals.
Is this the merest glimmer, the simplest suggestion that maybe things are changing, that the macho posturing, huffing, puffing and blowing from the likes of Howard and Beazley could be on the way to becoming a thing of the past?
Truthfully, the answer is in all likelyhood no.
That would be sensible, honest and altruistic, something that modern politics could never be accused of being. On the otherhand we can only hope.
Having said all of that, the list of who voted where that is available on the Bartlett Diaries
www.andrewbartlett.com/blog/?p=138 site makes for interesting reading. Particularly when one looks at the patterns of the Liberal Party. Surprises included Vanstone voting for the bill, but also the way the votes align.
On one side we have Abbot, Howard and Downer. On the other the likes of Andrew Southcott, Malcolm Turnbull QC and Peter Costello. Is this more evidence of the nasty factional split that we all know lies at the heart of the Libs? Could this be Costello, sickening of being shafted by Howard (think over the last few months) positioning himself for another run at the top job. Could this even be evidence of a new moderate or liberal consrvatism.
I can't wait to see what happens next!

